Boy, I hope this works. CastorTroy 18:01, 10 March 2007 (PST)
- Yeah, it's Bob. I was sacred as hell when i saw all of that and no one had blocked him yet. Thanks for the reverting help. --Marik7772003 06:57, 21 March 2007 (PDT)
Hey Castor, yeah there was an issue with Silva's transcription as it was stolen from another site, with him taking full credit for it. As for the transcribing, we normally let Spooky add them simply cause he/she has done all the others, so there's a consistency in style etc - Spooky also routinely does them every week and we've made an agreement to be able to host them. I haven't personally arranged all this so I'm not the best to ask, maybe you could do some, but I'd check with the other SysOps - don't want all that hard work just getting replaced with Spooky's version when its done! Thank you for your kind offer at any rate! Later, --Nickb123 (Talk) 10:50, 26 March 2007 (PDT)
Hi CastorTroy, I see you have been asking a few people about the episodes transcripts and you volunteered to do some of them. I hope you don't mind if I jump into the conversation. I'm just an ordinary user, but maybe I can help add some light on a few of your questions. First, I assume that you are aware of the time and effort required by the making of each transcript. I did only two of those for our French version of Lostpedia and I can say it took a lot more time than I initially expected. However, I'm not saying this to discourage you, only to make sure you know what you are volunteering for if your intention is of writing them rapidly after each episode.
About Spooky, she has been dutifully doing the transcripts for Lost-tv.com and Losttv-forum.com for three years now. Her average record over those three years is quite good for completing each transcript in only a few days after the corresponding episode, although there have been very rare times when she went on hiatuses for two or three weeks. Which is entirely normal and understandable given that she needs to relax a little like everybody sometimes. There would be no harm done to her if someone else did some transcripts for Lostpedia, because she does them for the aforementioned websites anyway, and Lostpedia only uses this good opportunity to grab them by the same occasion. The main reason why some people here seem to prefer to continue with her transcripts is a reason of uniformity of format. However, IMHO, there's no reaso why someone else couldn't do transcripts here in a relatively similar format.
About another of your questions, the person who was principally in contact with Spooky for Lospedia may well not be around here anymore for a long time, given extremely serious problems in her personal life, she may not be able to contact Spooky anymore anyway, and Lost is not likely to be in her priorities right now. I can see no reason why you couldn't contact Spooky directly and talk with her about the fact that you are volunteering for the transcripts on Lospedia (if you are really serious about your offer) and ask her what she thinks of it. She is not very active throuh her account on Lostpedia or on Losttv-forum, but I think the best way to contact her is still to leave her a private message at her account on Losttv-forum.com (you would have to register there to do that, of course). My advice to you, for what it's worth, would be for you to talk about it with Spooky and then talk again with perhaps Santa or whoever might be interested to take up the coordination of the transcripts here now.
hi, sorry. i don't like it when people try to force me to watch clips either. however, please watch the entire clip. thanks Enturbulate
troy, honestly i think you completely misunderstand what i am saying or talking about regarding this pressing matter. That is to explain again, i didn't link that video because it was "spam" or i was joking around. that video directly correlates with LOST. i am assuming you know about the LOST EXPERIENCE. by the way, feel free to leave more comments. however, it will be pointless to bring up the clip about cults and "i'm lost" if you don't watch it. thanks mate Enturbulate
thanks for the help and support with the article. my thoughts on the video are that whilst it was annoying that Enturbulate over-enthusiastically spammed it, and for some reason seems to think Scientology is a "pressing matter" rather than an oddly fashionable bit of bad pop-psychology. i do think that the video is relevant to the article. though it could be much better placed and explained. I feel there are many resonances between the people in the video and the others. And after all Cults go after people who are Lost your thoughts.
I have copied this message to that annoying Enturbulate person.
TomCruise 11:07, 26 March 2007 (PDT)
Nanobots need love too!!!!!!! ;)11:11, 26 March 2007 (PDT)
- Haha, I love this I found on the talk page of that scientology article: "as Hooper got in a ninja edit." I'd like my own ninja user box now!!!!! Sorry, that was just a hilarious way to put it, and very true. Thanks. Now to make that user box. 13:45, 26 March 2007 (PDT)
- what are NanoBots???
TomCruise 11:52, 26 March 2007 (PDT)
Paulo and Nikki
Thank you for explain to me why you hate them. Now I have a good explanation. and don't worry, my english suck. --Caio wgm 18:41, 28 March 2007 (PDT)