Talk:White tennis shoe

delete

• Delete - insignificant item. No reference provided for supposed citation in the text. Every minor prop should not have an article without other significance or justification. ALSO: Capitalization is wrong. As it is not a proper noun, it should be White tennis shoe. It also had multiple spelling errors which I corrected. -- ^Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯  ^Talk 01:30, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
• Keep: I don't know why the history has vanished, but this page is old. I remember it being delete nominated in the past and the outcome was keep. We liked its obscuity (sp?!) and also that it is in a way quite flair-ish and still a mystery - looked like a kid's shoe, but we don't know who's. It was specifically mentioned in the script for some meaning, whether its cinematic/metaphorical...we don't know. With no clear reason for it being there, its still commentworthy --Nickb123 (Talk) 12:17, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
• Keep: I don't have a problem with this being kept. --   Jabberwock    talk    contribs    email   - 07:30, 18 September 2006 (PDT)
• That's two to one, sorry, Santa. --SilvaStorm

Magic Shoes?

What?--NotARedHerring 12:28, 13 October 2006 (PDT)

Producer reference

- *I seem to remember someon like JJ or Damon mentioning that the fans missed a big detail somewhere in The Pilot, and that some fans subsequently deduced that this comment may be a reference to this shoe. Could someone find this reference and add it to the article? -- ^Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯  ^Talk 14:53, 14 December 2006 (PST)

Merge

• Merge: Why and why are there articles with limited text, two or three pictures, linked to a character of lost or even a place in lost. what is the meaning of having own articles which is not longer than that i write now. --Wilbraham Williams 08:44, 26 May 2007 (PDT)

• Disagree:The meaning is they are all important things in the show. We are Lostpedia, not Wikipedia, our sole focus is Lost. If you disagree with the way we structure our wiki then sorry, but unfortunately that isn't going to change as it is the decisions of hundreds of wiki users. I would consider merging this article if it was to be merged with a reasonable article. Although the Christian Shephard article has no room for a small tidbit like this, it would be lost forever. Plus the connection is very slim. Just because it resembles the shoe worn by another character does not mean it is his. -Mr.Leaf 10:11, 27 May 2007 (PDT)