Talk:Whatever Happened, Happened

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Whatever Happened, Happened article. General discussion about the article's subject is permitted as a way to aid improvement of the article. Theories about the article subject should not be discussed here. (Instead, post your theory to this article's theory page or discuss it on this article's theory talk page.)
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.	Be polite, don't bite, have fun! Admins are here to help More discussion at the Forum	Article policies Canonicity Spoiler policy Theory policy

Time travel explication

The discussion between Miles and Hurley seemed to shed some light on the workings of spacetime and time travel in the Lost universe. --Pags 03:09, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Pags

I think it helped clear some things up, now we know that everything that has happened is for sure something that already/is supposed to happen. This clears up any, "They're changing the past!" theories that people have came up with. They cannot change something that has already happened, because no matter what they do, it's something they already did.-- SawBucks  Talk  Contribs  06:26, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

cultural reference

cultural reference - back to the future. Omggivemaafningusername

Errors

When Kate and Aaron are in the grocery store, and Kate talks to the man handling boxes, the boxes appear to contain Gatorade with the "G" logo, which didn't begin until 2009. Darmikau 02:39, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

In "He's Our You", Ben's wound was on the left side of his chest, seemingly where his heart would be located. In this episode, however, his wound is on the right side of his chest

Ben's Wound

--Pags 02:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)Pags

• Ben's wound seems like too much of a blooper, lately is it just me or is there some strange bloopers around like the car at Red Square in He's Our You. Anyone else think that these large bloopers are almost like easter eggs? --Cerberus1838 06:33, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • No, I think they're artifacts of a very-difficult-to-produce television show having very eagle-eyed viewers.  Robert K S   tell me  06:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Bea Klugh?

I couldn't get a good look - was Bea among the Others that arrived when Kate and Sawyer took Ben to see Richard? It's the second shot of the Others, after the man says "Hold it right there" or whatever. The person I'm referring to is coming down the hill with a gun. I don't have HD - can someone get a better look at that? --The_Swan 03:15, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

• It wasn't Bea. The person you are referring to was a man. cooldog 07:19, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Mikhail?

Was the guy protesting Richard from helping Ben, Mikhail? He sounded Russian and he could have been him, anyone else think so? --LOST-Frink 05:04, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Impossible. He arrived on the Island in the 1990s. -- Xbenlinusx 05:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

The Others' Hierarchy

Who does Erik (The man who speaks to Richard) say "we" should ask first? Sounded like Ellie, or Eli? Also, it would seem that at this point Widmore is somewhere in the higher up of the power structure. Erik seemed worried that Charles would "find out" which would corroborate what Widmore told John in 2008 when he stated that he was the leader for a time. He may not be in charge yet, but clearly holds some rank over The Others. --Airport Whiskey 05:46, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Erik says to Richard, "Richard, shouldn't do this without telling Ellie, and if Charles finds out".

Richard says "Let Him find out, I don't answer to either of them." --Cerberus1838 06:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Ben-centric?

This is probably splitting hairs, but it wouldn't be the first time an episode ended with a flash from a different character. Since Richard carrying Ben led into the last scene with the whoosh sound, should this also count as a Ben flashforward episode? In any case, from a less technical perspective, most of this episode was focused on Ben and the survivors deciding what to do about him. --Pyramidhead 05:51, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

• I'd say it is pretty definite that this is a Kate-centric episode. The cut to Ben at the end was just foreshadowing in my mind. --KevinS6 06:06, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Of course it's Kate-centric. I'm just saying it might also be Ben-centric a la "Dave". --Pyramidhead 06:11, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
• It wasn't a flash, its a shift showing you whats happening in the future, shifts between past and future shouldn't matter to whose episode it is, just as Locke's statement "Well come to the land of the living" shouldn't be read as Ben was dead before and only just woke up, he will wake up in his own time his confused look was just confusion in seeing Locke, which he killed is alive again. --Cerberus1838 06:29, 2 April 2009 (UTC)