*Exactly what I thought. Frankly I don't think the survivors' behavior is realistic now (maybe the sickness ? :p). [[User:TheAma1|TheAma1]] 12:51, 1 March 2007 (PST)
*Exactly what I thought. Frankly I don't think the survivors' behavior is realistic now (maybe the sickness ? :p). [[User:TheAma1|TheAma1]] 12:51, 1 March 2007 (PST)
*I disagree; I think that the existence of the hatch was enough to tell the survivors that there had been some degree of civilization before them, and a faulty van with little likelihood of working isn't exactly a way to get off of the island anyway. And, on a more hypothetical note, after two months on the island I think it's more realistic for the survivors to be lukewarm about risking their lives or health to escape. (just putting myself in their position)
*I disagree; I think that the existence of the hatch was enough to tell the survivors that there had been some degree of civilization before them, and a faulty van with little likelihood of working isn't exactly a way to get off of the island anyway. And, on a more hypothetical note, after two months on the island I think it's more realistic for the survivors to be lukewarm about risking their lives or health to escape. (just putting myself in their position)
+
**The car itself is bound to be useless, and the fact that Hurley could just pop the clutch after several years in the jungle, on its side, should be included in the [[miracles]] article. What I'm talking about is a road. A VW Bus isn't the prime of all off-road vehicles, so there must have been a road. Roads go places. Places with phones and radios. It just seems worth investigating. If it seems too dangerous, send Nikki and Paulo- they're expendable! -{{User:beardog4314/sig}} 13:26, 1 March 2007 (PST)
== Synopsis ==
== Synopsis ==
Is there any reason why our synopses are specifically excluding a sentence about the flashback? They are pretty much half of every episode.
Is there any reason why our synopses are specifically excluding a sentence about the flashback? They are pretty much half of every episode.
+
:*Flashbacks do go in the synopsis, we just give them their own section for clarity. -{{User:beardog4314/sig}} 13:26, 1 March 2007 (PST)
Sorry, that's not an official source. Read LP:TP for details on what is considered an official source. -- Jabberwock talk contribs email - 07:54, 31 January 2007 (PST)
OK, after further research I did find the press release mentioned in your article. The source is on ABC Medianet, and that is an official source. word doc. -- Jabberwock talk contribs email - 08:02, 31 January 2007 (PST)
I'll second that. Another one that will get nominated for deletion without sourcing. --Minderbinder 08:04, 5 November 2006 (PST)
I'm pretty sure SecretAgentMan has said this and he's not usually wrong. We can just keep it up and if the title is changed then we'll change it here too. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Bettyfizzw (talk • contribs) .
Is that a rumor site? If this is rumored, put it on Lost Season 3/prespoilers, and link to the source. "Not usually wrong" isn't good enough for a main article, facts need to come from ABC or directly from the creators. --Minderbinder 08:24, 5 November 2006 (PST)
Deletion nomination
Delete unless a source is added ASAP. LP is not a rumor site, and articles like this damage the credibility of the site. --Minderbinder 08:16, 5 November 2006 (PST)
Why is this page still here? I'm marking it for deletion (which will have to be here since the article is locked). --Minderbinder 15:10, 20 November 2006 (PST)
Page Protected
This page is protected. Lostpedia does not allow rumoured episode titles, only episodes confirmed by ABC Medianet. -- Plkrtn talk contribs email 15:25, 20 November 2006 (PST)
IMDB
Hey i know that IMDB isnt an official source or anything, but I thought id put this information somewhere anyway, on alot of the actors pages, both Not In Portland and Tricia Tanaka is Dead are listed titles that the actors have been credited for, maybe it gives evidence that its a possibility that episode eight will be Tricia Tanaka Is Dead. --lewisg 07:12, 13 December 2006 (PST)
Unless there's official citation we're not adding it - IMDB is updated by users and shouldn't be seen as any kind of "proof" (though that said it'll probably be the title I reckon - Spoiler sources on ep titles have been pretty good this year) --Nickb123(Talk) 07:35, 13 December 2006 (PST)
Ah cool, no problem then i wasnt asking for it to be added hehe. I didnt know IMDB was updated by users lol, learn something new everyday :D --lewisg 07:36, 13 December 2006 (PST)
See LP:TP for the theory policy. ABC Medianet is generally the only official source for episode dates, titles, etc. -- Jabberwock talk contribs email - 10:03, 13 December 2006 (PST)
Why do I need to see the theory policy *confused*.. thanks anyway.. and yes i know, which is why i started off this talk with "I know that IMBD isnt an official source". --lewisg 11:18, 13 December 2006 (PST)
Hurley flashback
Wasn't it confirmed on the LOST podcast that ep10 was a Hurley flashback? --Blueeagleislander 23:34, 5 February 2007 (PST)
It turns out it was, 30th of Oct 2006 one. Where's a sysop where you need one? --Blueeagleislander 02:01, 6 February 2007 (PST)
Hello! Why do you need a SysOp? There is no mention of the podcast on this page, and really, there isn't any need for one, is there? -- Plkrtn talk contribs email 02:20, 6 February 2007 (PST)
The Hurley flashback needs to be added to the infobox. See the 30th of Oct podcast. --Blueeagleislander 19:21, 6 February 2007 (PST)
Cheech!
Woo! Cheech is going to be in the episode, according to the promo stills. Should be hilarious. --Marik7772003 17:16, 8 February 2007 (PST)
I'm 99.9% sure it wasn't Apollo. The wrapper was way lighter blue, and the lettering didn't seem the same. LM doesn't have any good screencaps of the bar; if you have found a pic, analyze it and see what it is. --Marik7772003 21:42, 28 February 2007 (PST)
I couldn't tell what the wrapper said, but the chocolate bar itself appeared to be a Nestle Crunch bar. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 21:47, 28 February 2007 (PST)
Looking over it several times it seems to say GL???R BAR... Looking at it when he opens it you can see the GL pretty well and what seems to be an A. When he eats it you can see the R and the BAR very clearly. Possibly GLAMOR BAR? Also, you can see the bar gets opened at the GL side and gets eaten by the BAR side-- ooooops! -- MCouto
definatley a CRUNCH bar but the wrapper said GRIZZLY Bar. There you go.10panichellia 09:29, 1 March 2007 (PST)
Why did someone call it Glacier Bar ? TheAma1 11:52, 1 March 2007 (PST)
If you look at good screencaps, that's what it says [1] --Jackdavinci 12:45, 1 March 2007 (PST)
Mr Cluck posters
I wonder if the Mr. Cluck posters ([2]) feature production staff? --Jackdavinci 03:32, 1 March 2007 (PST)
Mr. Cluck's van numbers
Doesn't seem to mean anything but the numbers on the Mr. Cluck's van were 513937 and the license plate was 3PCI017. --Jackdavinci 03:38, 1 March 2007 (PST)
Unanswered Questions
Content removed from article for discussion
How come "Roger" has his name and job title on his jumpsuit, but Kelvin did not, when they both were in the Swan station?
I think this fact is insignificant and most likely a creative choice. Kelvin's jumpsuit was generic and Roger's was personalized. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 10:31, 1 March 2007 (PST)
How did the dart that Sawyer stepped on get in the jungle?
Most likely from the hatch implosion/explosion. Kate and Sawyer were close to the beach at the time and we already know that items such as the hatch door were thrown at least that far when Desmond turned the key. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 10:31, 1 March 2007 (PST)
cars = roads?
Why was no one interested in a car, when Hurley came running out of the jungle? Wouldn't anyone want to go looking for the road it drove off of? Does anyone even want off this island anymore? Are they just so used to the bizarre that it's not even worth looking at anymore? -BearDog 12:48, 1 March 2007 (PST)
Exactly what I thought. Frankly I don't think the survivors' behavior is realistic now (maybe the sickness ? :p). TheAma1 12:51, 1 March 2007 (PST)
I disagree; I think that the existence of the hatch was enough to tell the survivors that there had been some degree of civilization before them, and a faulty van with little likelihood of working isn't exactly a way to get off of the island anyway. And, on a more hypothetical note, after two months on the island I think it's more realistic for the survivors to be lukewarm about risking their lives or health to escape. (just putting myself in their position)
The car itself is bound to be useless, and the fact that Hurley could just pop the clutch after several years in the jungle, on its side, should be included in the miracles article. What I'm talking about is a road. A VW Bus isn't the prime of all off-road vehicles, so there must have been a road. Roads go places. Places with phones and radios. It just seems worth investigating. If it seems too dangerous, send Nikki and Paulo- they're expendable! -BearDog 13:26, 1 March 2007 (PST)
Synopsis
Is there any reason why our synopses are specifically excluding a sentence about the flashback? They are pretty much half of every episode.
Flashbacks do go in the synopsis, we just give them their own section for clarity. -BearDog 13:26, 1 March 2007 (PST)
