My Unanswered Question was removed from this page, so maybe I added it incorrectly or something, but I think it's a valid question that this woman may have worked for either Ben or Widmore, and it may have been an attempt to abduct Aaron for the Island's purposes, or any other number of reasons. Sithboy 20:23, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

  • I agree. I found that seen incredibly creepy, and I did NOT get the impression that she was "sweet." I thought she was trying to kidnap Aaron (though it didn't occur to me that she was working for Widmore or Linus, I just thought she was a lady who wanted a kid of her onw.)C.m. 13:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Sweet young woman?

Seriously? I mean, not that the chick isn't cool, but that title is hardly descriptive and is way subjective. I suggest we rename the article. My suggestion:

  • Well, does that dictate we abide by that title? We have tons of articles in which we gave better names for characters than those in official press releases. — Iimitk  T  C  19:00, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Yeah I know - but she really was just a sweet young woman. It seems more descriptive and distinct than just blonde woman. -- CTS  Talk   Contribs 19:04, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
  • Does it? No. Should it? I think so for clarity's sake. And it just makes it easier to find the article using the press release/credits. Jinxmchue 16:54, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
  • In this case, her credited name is fine. If it was just "woman" or "blonde woman", I'd add the "(Whatever Happened, Happened)". But we don't have any other sweet young woman on this wiki so this character's current name is fine. No rename. --Mistertrouble189 22:06, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

When I suggested renaming the article, I wasn't aware of the fact that the title was that of an official press release, so it came odd to me a Lostpedia editor had thought out of such a title. No biggie, rock 'n' roll, sweet young woman. :-P — Iimitk  T  C  23:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)

checked out the screencaps for this episode..."sweet young woman" screencap is one of the most viewed...there has GOT to be more to this person! --Justmisplaced 20:21, 16 April 2009 (UTC)CJM