7,383 Pages

Days

I've put it at Day 88 given her comment about seeing the baby the night before. Dharmatel4 12:20, 3 December 2007 (PST)

aired (abc.com)

Is it policy to add the airdate for abc.com only when it has actually been published? Would make sense, but just checking. --DJVok 13:32, 3 December 2007 (PST)

Yeah. ABC aren't releasing them consistently.--Mc peko 04:50, 4 December 2007 (PST)

Rename

ABC now has the credits for this one up; it is called "Operation: Sleeper", with a colon. You can also make it out on the video, if you squint just right. -- Graft   talk   contributions  00:17, 4 December 2007 (PST)

• Agreed. Rename.--Mc peko 04:46, 4 December 2007 (PST)
• Agree. It seems to be the official name —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jamster (talkcontribs) .

Please sign.--Mc peko 09:23, 4 December 2007 (PST)

• Agree - Lost Wikia also listed it as Operation: Sleeper when they posted it yesterday morning --Hen-Regale 10:39, 4 December 2007 (PST)
• Rename: abc.com uses that name. --  11:09, 4 December 2007 (PST)

Agree. Rename. --Gluphokquen Gunih 11:10, 4 December 2007 (PST)

Can a sysop fix this so we get rid of those broken links?--Mc peko 11:15, 4 December 2007 (PST)

Done.-Mr.Leaf 12:36, 4 December 2007 (PST)

Trivia - Themes

Sorry but I dont agree with the line stating that Juliet being tired of living Bens dream should fall under the Dreams theme category. This is because the dreams theme is more based around supernatural visions etc, not somebodies aims or goals. --Lewis-Talk-Contribs 05:35, 5 December 2007 (PST)

• Until we know for sure that Ben didn't have some sort of vision (and really, Jacob's instruction could be seen as a supernatural vision), we've got to make all the connections we can. I think it should stay.TheBookPolice 06:53, 5 December 2007 (PST)
• That completely makes no sense, if anything that should go into the theory section until PROVEN. --Lewis-Talk-Contribs 08:24, 5 December 2007 (PST)
• Unless proven, Lewis is correct, it is a theory. We don't know anything for a fact. Juliet could just be saying she is tired of doing what Ben wants and not what she wants. There is no proof, I'm removing the line. If you want add it to the theories page but the line is ambiguous and nothing is definitive. -Mr.Leaf 08:31, 5 December 2007 (PST)
• Good point. I guess I was thinking more of whether it was a valuable connection or not, and not whether it should be in the main article, or in Theories. I agree with that move.TheBookPolice 06:28, 6 December 2007 (PST)

Protest

I strongly disagree with the removal of the episode references for all the mobisodes. Especially since the the point of the missing pieces is to fill the gaps. You can't describe the holes, without describing the cheese --Hunter61 13:16, 5 December 2007 (PST)

The main body of text states where the mobisode slots in with the overall mythology --Lewis-Talk-Contribs 13:25, 5 December 2007 (PST)

I also strongly disagree with the sweeping removal of all episode references. It is a great reference tool; a useful way to annotate and describe all the links that the stories make among all the episodes. And certainly no less so in the mobisodes, where the scenes are compact and self-contained; it fleshes out and clarifies episode context within the larger story in a way that can't be accomplished by the synopses. As someone who was only a reader of LP up until a few months ago, I consider the information they bring to the articles highly valuable, and I refer to them all the time. As Carlton Cuse describes it, Lost is a mosaic, and though you may find them to be useless, I think most people would consider these to be a great way to begin to piece the mosaic together. -- Graft   talk   contributions  18:32, 5 December 2007 (PST)

Feel free to re-add, I was wrong --Lewis-Talk-Contribs 04:07, 6 December 2007 (PST)

Bring it back, yes. Don't delete stuff that is both relevant and fun.--Mc peko 20:22, 7 December 2007 (PST)

I've reversed it. The references are back now. --Hunter61 20:49, 7 December 2007 (PST)

$Insert formula here$