the lost experience[]
Should we add the letyourcompassguideyou.com to the lost exprience section? --Phil 07:26, 18 May 2006 (PDT)
--Plkrtn 19:30, 19 May 2006 (PDT)== Update == This page is in serious need of an update.--Peephole 16:35, 18 May 2006 (PDT)
- It is being constantly changed and refined. Its never being left static. --Plkrtn 19:06, 19 May 2006 (PDT)
- I believe what Peephole is referring to is a major overhaul/clean up. I agree; this page is majorly cluttered. However, it can look a lot better with some reformatting to make the boxes line up. One thing that would help would be to change the lists of stuff into links to the category pages. -- Ramirez Selvarn
- I'm currently working on building Portals for the sections covered at the bottom. See Portal:Characters for a little preview of what I've done so far. Its by no means finished yet though. Moving them into their own section and just listing the portals toward the top of the page would clean this up considerably. --Plkrtn 19:30, 19 May 2006 (PDT)
Adding content to The Lost Experience box[]
I think a link to The Lost Experience Clues page would be really helpful for those of us who visit the site often for that reason. Zombiebomb 23:23, 18 May 2006 (PDT)
Thanks for the add! Zombiebomb 18:45, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
Newly Tidied Front Page[]
I've tidied up the front page some what, and reduced the garish colour scheme, but I still need help making the portals look a little bit more swanky. Any volunteers? --Plkrtn 04:47, 20 May 2006 (PDT)
- id love to, why not bring back some of the soft oranges and purples for the news and "next..." sections? I still like the trimmed down front page though
talk contribs 06:47, 20 May 2006 (PDT)
Article of the Week[]
OK, I've kicked off article of the week with the article on Mr. Friendly (He was the first person to come into my head)... How future articles are decided (Executive decision or sysop vote) is up to others to discuss. I will maintain this, and this week in Lost if you wish, but if someone else would like to take Article of the Week and own it for themselves, I don't mind that either. --Plkrtn 07:28, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
- I would prefer a page such as this. This is the same format I set up at HRWiki last year, and it's been working well thusfar. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 20:44, 23 May 2006 (PDT)
Well[]
I've done my best to contact Admin. I found a phone number to call (that is not the fax number listed on the whois) and left a voicemail. I also emailed four different email addresses that there is an emergency that needs dealing with here. Let's hope this can be resolved soon. --Circeus 17:52, 24 May 2006 (PDT)
I want this to be over. I am not even supposed to work today! Thanks to Plkrtn for the spoiler free policy, hope I can still be spoiler-free. †††GodEmperorOfHell††† --17:55, 24 May 2006 (PDT)
Suggestion[]
we can put links to external links in the main page.. like frappr map frappr map and the orkut community orkut community --.:: 
zOn3™ ::.
Only see edits before a certain date?[]
It would nice if there was a way we could only see edits before a certain date for the people in other countries or timezones. --Recurr 13:31, 25 May 2006 (PDT)
Like, Do not show edits after m/d/y or Show only history before m/d/y. --Recurr 13:32, 25 May 2006 (PDT)
Cleanup template/Banner/Category[]
i have notciced that alot of the pages are getting filled with out of date info, and i couldnt find a cleanup template, so i made one. hope it can be of some use, and sorry if i have been so dense that i couldn't see the existing template.
an example is here: {{cleanup}} i have also produced one for talk pages: Template:Talk Cleanup
I would be really chuffed if people could start using them on cluttered pages!
- Mikey - "so emo, it hurts"© 06:52, 29 May 2006 (PDT)
Spelling Error in edit box[]
* Please use the 'Show Preview' button before saving changes in order to check your submission for erros...
ironic, really - Mikey - "so emo, it hurts"©
Grammar and Tenses[]
There seems to be no real consensus of what tense to use describing events as the occur in the show. People generally seem to put the most recent episode in the present tense and all others in the past, which makes things confusing. Is there any strong objection to consistently putting all activities taken in the past tense? --Frieze 09:45, 30 May 2006 (PDT)
there was a conscious decision to NOT produce a style guide, but i think past tense would be best - Mikey - "so emo, it hurts"©
i would say past, as in kate did this jack did that, unless it applies to a trait, as above. it would get uber complicated to put it those in the past tense, and the characters still excist. Kates flashback revealed her to have been... nah! - Mikey - "so emo, it hurts"©
[]
Template:Nav
im really sorry but i dont like the {{nav}} box. its big and clunky, doesn't seem to serve any really useful purpose - Mikey - "so emo, it hurts"©
- I agree, it has little purpose to have it on every page--CaptainInsano
- I agree that it should not be used on every page, but a pared down version could be useful for certain pages, such as navigating through the episode guides, or characters. Each section in the {{nav}} template could be its own smaller navigation box.
Jabberwock talk contribs email - 08:20, 31 May 2006 (PDT)- I agree as well. Make one nav template for "Main Characters" and one for "Supporting Characters" and one for "Companies", etc. --Elvis 09:05, 31 May 2006 (PDT)
I'm trying to come up with something simpler -- take a look at
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Template:Nav-Main
| |||||
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Template:Nav-Minor
Template:Nav-Minor (changed from an include, because this template automatically includes this article in an unwanted category --Dagg 14:16, 13 December 2006 (PST))
It may need some wiki-Template formatting help, since these are just broken-down versions of the main giant Nav template...
I created a Locations Navigator. --Peephole 10:18, 18 June 2006 (PDT)
http://lostpedia.com/wiki/Template:Nav-Locations
But it would be easy to break down the components of the main template in to these mini-templates...
Jenolen 10:41, 31 May 2006 (PDT)
I think these things should have their own page, and a link to this page should be on the bottom.
Those navigators are getting ridiculous. I mean some articles now have the lost navigator AND the lost experience navigator. The general lost navigator should be divided up in categories. So we can put a locations navigator in a location article, a persons navigator in a person article, etc. And I think the lost experience navigator should be trimmed down to just the "This information was discovered throught the experience blablaba".--Peephole 17:43, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
Anyone else think it would be a good idea to split the characters into "characters stranded on the island", "characters of the lost experience", "DHARMA initiative characters" and "the others". Instead of the main/minor division we've got going at the moment? --Peephole 02:09, 14 June 2006 (PDT)
Format of Episode Titles[]
I'm curious about how episode titles appear in entries. I think they should be italicized (quotes can be so yucky.) Examples of how this would look include:
I think this looks classy, and helps readability for a sentence such as:
In the episode What Kate Did, Kate's flashback reveals her to be...
Is there any consensus on the episode title issue?? In some way, they should be set off from the regular text and links...
Jenolen 10:24, 31 May 2006 (PDT)
- When referring to a specific title of an episode, book, song, or other such work, it is good practice to wrap the title in qotation marks. For example, "[[The Whole Truth]]" becomes "The Whole Truth". The TV Series Lost would be considered a "longer-work" and should be italicized.
- Example: The Lost episode "Dave" showed Hurley in a mental health institute.
- Jabberwock talk contribs email - 20:56, 1 June 2006 (PDT)
That's true... but I'm not sure it looks good when Wikified. For example:
Episode 1x07, "The Moth", featured moths when Charlie was on screen.
Look at how the quotation marks aren't wikified. Ugly! Also, you get in to a lot of "where do I put the comma" issues... should the comma be wikified? Should it be inside the quotes? Outside? (I know the answers... I'm just saying most users aren't grammar absolutists... ;) )
Also -- I think there's a case to be made that since every title in the LOSTpedia is assumed to refer to an episode of LOST, using italics for titles wouldn't be completely out of line. In our test sentence, this would look like:
Episode 1x07, The Moth, featured moths when Charlie was on screen.
Something to consider! :)
Jenolen 10:38, 2 June 2006 (PDT)
- I don't see how it looks ugly the grammatically correct way, so we'll just have to agree to disagree. If you really want to wikify they quotes with the article name, use [[The Moth|"The Moth"]] which looks like this: "The Moth"
Jabberwock talk contribs email - 18:31, 2 June 2006 (PDT)
- Agree. Quotation marks for episodes; underline or italicise for series title. -- LOSTonthisdarnisland 04:00, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
All Theories[]
Express any theories about anything for Lost under The Jigsaw Theories at the search engine!!!!--Jigsaw 15:47, 31 May 2006 (PDT)
Link to Search Engine Plugin on Main Page[]
Add Search Engine Plugin for Mozilla on Lostpedia main page
Broken on Firefox?[]
I have always used Mozilla Firefox to access this wiki, but now it doesn't display correctly. I can't see the new logo, the article/discussion/edit... tabs are missing, and in general the whole page layout is a disaster. It all seems to look normal in Internet Explorer. Was there a recent html makeover that wasn't checked on other common browsers? Bill 11:17, 2 June 2006 (PDT)
- What version of Firefox do you have? I have 1.5.0.3 and it displays fine. Try clearing your cache and updating to the latest version.
Jabberwock talk contribs email - 11:24, 2 June 2006 (PDT)
Works fine for me. LostRoland 18:00, 2 June 2006 (PDT)
Use shift+Control+R (shift command R on mac) to empty the cache, I'm using Firefox 1.5.0.4 and works fine. --†††GodEmperorOfHell††† 18:07, 2 June 2006 (PDT)
It had been "broken" for several days ... then 5 minutes after I posted, it sorted itself out. Weird. Bill 12:29, 4 June 2006 (PDT)
News[]
Why is there a spoiler on the main page? --Peephole 11:17, 5 June 2006 (PDT)
Seconded! While I'm aware that the entire site should be considered a spoiler, folks hit the front page of LostPedia not anticipating spoilers. A headline like "'Lost' will go on without murderous Michael", for international folks who haven't had the opportunity to see the final arc of the second season, is extraordinarily rude. —XSG 12:14, 5 June 2006 (PDT)
It's also a bit of a spoiler for season three. --Peephole 12:48, 5 June 2006 (PDT)
Suggestion for a different pullquote: "When Michael departed the island, he left behind three of the show's most popular characters - Jack, Kate and Sawyer - who were being held captive by a mysterious group called "The Others" living on the other side of the island. It was not clear whether Michael and Walt were actually going to leave the island and go home (as The Others had instructed them to do) or if they'd go back to their camp to get help." -- LOSTonthisdarnisland 03:54, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
Guys, its at 998 pages, 2 more!
- It will only change with a complete article, notice it won't change with stubs. --†††GodEmperorOfHell††† 17:33, 8 June 2006 (PDT)
"'Lost' will go on without murderous Michael"[]
Can this be changed please? The content says "Spoilers for next season: read more" but the title gives it away.
International Airdates[]
These are very out of date, listing an episode that aired 2 weeks ago for the United Kingdom. Can we please get someone who actually lives in the UK to edit these in a timely fashion? --Keyes 11:40, 7 June 2006 (PDT)
The next episode is "Orientation", in the US.
um... porn?[]
The main logo image is porn as is the jupiter hosting image at the bottom of the page... is this intentional? I wouldn't think so but you never know... --Offput 17:21, 8 June 2006 (PDT)
Whut?--†††GodEmperorOfHell††† 17:22, 8 June 2006 (PDT)
I'm guessing someone's been messing with his style sheet... Funny. —XSG 17:48, 8 June 2006 (PDT)
The Thousandth article[]
I am really proud of being part of LOSTpedia specially when I read the statistics for the wiki controlled by the Others...
There are 1,848 total pages in the database. This includes "talk" pages, pages about LOST, minimal "stub" pages, redirects, and others that probably don't qualify as content pages. Excluding those, there are 812 pages that are probably legitimate content pages.
690 files have been uploaded.
There have been a total of 5,691 page views, and 7,816 page edits since the wiki was setup. That comes to 4.23 average edits per page, and 0.73 views per edit.
And our own...
There are 6,238 total pages in the database. This includes "talk" pages, pages about LostPedia, minimal "stub" pages, redirects, and others that probably don't qualify as content pages. Excluding those, there are 1,001 pages that are probably legitimate content pages.
There have been a total of 13,332,816 page views, and 51,299 page edits since the wiki was setup. That comes to 8.22 average edits per page, and 259.90 views per edit.
Congratulations everyone. The numbers speak for themselves, we are the best. --†††GodEmperorOfHell††† 06:08, 9 June 2006 (PDT)
WOOOOO!!!! 1,000 articles! (whether appropriate or not :P ) Tebor 11:49, 9 June 2006 (PDT)
Congratulations to all! This is truly a nice milestone that has been steadily approaching these past weeks, and it feels nice to finally pass it. Looks like the main page discussion is sort of a de facto community portal today =). Cheers to all. -- Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯ Talk 18:49, 9 June 2006 (PDT)
Other fun facts: When you look up Lost Wikia in Google , the first result is http://lostpedia.com/wiki/The_LOST_Wikia. :) --Peephole 09:41, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
- It was. Looks like it changes every so often. Anyway, if you do a search for "Lost Wiki" or "Lost Encyclopedia" you get lostpedia.com.
Jabberwock talk contribs email - 10:46, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
- It was. Looks like it changes every so often. Anyway, if you do a search for "Lost Wiki" or "Lost Encyclopedia" you get lostpedia.com.
- We are a better reference about their site than their own site! That is the funniest thing I have ever heard in my life! Does anyone know what the largest community based wiki is? How do we compare? Congradulations! I'm so glad and proud to be part of this UBER-geek lost community experience! We should eventually publish an un-official lostpedia-encyclopedia. Crazier things have happened! I'd buy that! We could maybe do it to raise money for the site/one of J.J. Abrams charities.--Jasoncarubia 20:53, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
- I've found this this we're not on it. But I've found this. Check who is listed under television!! If we compare to the Star Trek wiki 19,401 memory-alpha we're doing pretty DARN good! Remember they have a whole lot more to catalog. The series began in 1966! That's 40 years of Star Trek (happy birthday)! LOST is an infant in comparison. No wait I take that back. LOST is a zygote. Look how far we've come along in LESS THAN A YEAR!!! I am so proud to be part of one of the fastest growing, deatailed, over-all fun fan sites on the internet! Let's keep up the great work and maybe one-day we'll surpass those giants.--Jasoncarubia 21:09, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
- We even had an article on Wikipedia at one time, but it was voted off the island. Our wiki has grown a lot since then and it would be great if someone wanted to try again. Any of our users have a long edit history on wikipedia could help the cause.
Jabberwock talk contribs email - 01:12, 11 June 2006 (PDT)- Let us know if it happens at wikipedia and someone rfds it so that existing users (with an edit history) will come in to vote. Also, it's worth noting that Wikipedia:Wikipedia:Notability (web) has changed significantly in the past year. External news references to Lostpedia may help tremendously, as it's no longer by user count or alexa ranking. Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯ Talk 14:21, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- We even had an article on Wikipedia at one time, but it was voted off the island. Our wiki has grown a lot since then and it would be great if someone wanted to try again. Any of our users have a long edit history on wikipedia could help the cause.
- I've found this this we're not on it. But I've found this. Check who is listed under television!! If we compare to the Star Trek wiki 19,401 memory-alpha we're doing pretty DARN good! Remember they have a whole lot more to catalog. The series began in 1966! That's 40 years of Star Trek (happy birthday)! LOST is an infant in comparison. No wait I take that back. LOST is a zygote. Look how far we've come along in LESS THAN A YEAR!!! I am so proud to be part of one of the fastest growing, deatailed, over-all fun fan sites on the internet! Let's keep up the great work and maybe one-day we'll surpass those giants.--Jasoncarubia 21:09, 10 June 2006 (PDT)
International Airdates[]
Need another sysop to volunteer to keep the international airdates current. I usually get the US Airdates, but the internationals aren't being updated. Any volunteers?
Jabberwock talk contribs email - 01:09, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
I guess I should cover Latin America, AXN's mayor territories are Argentina, Venezuela and Mexico, as well as the rest of Central and South America, that's pretty important, don't you think?. --†††GodEmperorOfHell††† 11:04, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
I was thinking more about the front page, but the full article is important too. If nobody is going to keep them current then they should be removed from the front page.
Jabberwock talk contribs email - 12:16, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
I've sent my volunteer message to your talk page for England. --Keyes 16:14, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
Rumors and Spoilers, Theories and Speculation Section[]
May I make a suggestion. For those people who love spoilers and rumors, or spend countless of hours speculating and theorising what is going to happen next that we make a separate portals/templates/jump sections off of the main site. It will help keep our spoiler policy and our theory policy separate. People in these area wouldn't be afraid to "get it all out" before editing content. It could be a great resource in developing our coimmunity as well. It would be a great hook as well to bring viewers to our site. (the spoiler community is HUGE)--Jasoncarubia 15:36, 11 June 2006 (PDT)
Long Pages[]
taking a look at Special:Longpages tonight, i think something's not right there. should the longest page on this wiki, Bigspaceship1 (and another in the top ten, marvincandle.com) be devoted to something confirmed very, very fanon? additionally, as great as the book is, The Third Policeman's article needs serious pruning. it would be logical to have important articles (The Others, The Numbers, episode synopses) as the most detailed articles, surely. kaini. 18:55, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
Talk:Main Page vs Talk:LostPedia[]
there are things that end up posted on this page that should not be here, by definition of the notice at the top, but end up here because there's no place else to put them. imo, a Talk:LostPedia page should be set up and prominently linked to cover these items, or else the wording of the notice be changed (a rather clumsy solution). I'll be more than happy to work out the wording if i have some degree of concensus. kaini. 18:55, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
- or, indeed, when i think about it; LostPedia:Talk would be a better name - it would fit with the format of LostPedia:Sandbox, and also is a start toward a Wikipedia:Village Pump style page - a hub where projects, policies, and the like which need attention can be discussed. kaini. 20:27, 12 June 2006 (PDT)
Creating New Pages[]
I've been looking forever for this link, but I can't find it. How do you create a new page? This is probably really simple, but I can't see the link for it anywhere. I've looked in the Wiki help section, but it only links to how to create a new general wiki, not one specifically within lostpedia. Oh, and is there another Help Desk or place to go for asking q's about lostpedia, without posting to this discussion page? Thanks.
--PandoraX 12:56, 18 June 2006 (PDT)
- There are several ways. 1. Click on any red link (for example, Monkeys) and it will create the page for you. This is a good place to start because red links are usually pages someone felt were needed or wanted, but just didn't have time to create at that time. or, 2. In the search box, type the name of the article you want to create (for example, Monkeys), then click "Go". It will say "No page with this exact title exists, trying full text search". Click on the red link and edit. Good luck! --Elvis 07:26, 19 June 2006 (PDT)
Or just type in the name of the page in the adress. For example, if you want to create a page on michael yelling walt just go to www.lostpedia.com/wiki/WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAALT and start editing away. --Peephole 11:13, 19 June 2006 (PDT)
- Actually see: Waaalt
- I was going to do it but I guess someone got to it long before I thought of it. =x
Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯ Talk 23:33, 30 June 2006 (PDT)
Article of the week[]
Why the hell is fail-safe article of the week when it wasn't even nominated?--Peephole 01:01, 19 June 2006 (PDT)
- You should read the comments on the article selection page. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 11:26, 19 June 2006 (PDT)
Ghostwriter of Bad Twin revealed![]
Please check out the reccomend a news item area. The ghostwriter of Bad Twin has been revealed!--Jasoncarubia 12:18, 19 June 2006 (PDT)
Transcripts[]
I know I shouldn't be putting this on the main oage, but this isn't about any particular subject. It's about the wiki as a whole. Do you think that it would be good to have the complete transcript? Y'know, for every episode? I just thought it would inform the users better. Seriously630 18:17, 22 June 2006 (PDT)
- Well, it would be too cumbersome, don't you think? we already link to the transcripts page, besides, we refer back to them whenever we have a question. --†††GodEmperorOfHell††† 18:34, 22 June 2006 (PDT)
- Yeah, I guess so. By the way, if you need any beautifying with any of the formatting, I'm up for the job. Seriously630 18:40, 22 June 2006 (PDT)
Lost Experience template[]
I added some links and tried tidying up the Lost Experience Template on the main page (aka Template:HotTopic). This one is at Template:HotTopic2.
Article of the Week []Lostpedia:Featured article for 2024, week 16 |
The Lost Experience[]Alternate Reality Game[]The new alternate reality game from the creators of Lost is now live. Lostpedia will of course be covering the new game. Please visit the following pages for more indepth information The Hanso Foundation · Executives · Correspondence · Phone Line Persephone · Gary Troup · DJ Dan · Retrievers of Truth · Rachel Blake · Bad Twin · The Valenzetti Equation The game has now launched internationally. If you are in any of the territories and you have any relevant information, don't hesitate to join in. |
--Aero Zeppelin 13:13, 6 July 2006 (PDT)
what happened?[]
why was lostpedia down? dposse 11:21, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
- ... and why were other lost sites down as well? Brian 11:22, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
- Can anyone explain what happened? - BlahDeBlahblah 13:27, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
- What other Lost websites were down? dposse 14:53, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
TLEC, Speaker and Lostpedia were all down at once. And as for why, Lostpedia went down last week for a day cause of maintenance work so I assume yesterday was a similar deal. It was probably just a coincidence that all three were down at the same time --Nickb123 (Talk) 15:03, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
www.oceanicflight815.com is one I still have problems accessing which is one of the official Lost sites. But I also noticed that I had problems accessing the main Disney sites aswell (of which ABC is a subsidary company) - BlahDeBlahblah 15:08, 13 July 2006 (PDT)
Wikipedia article[]
To people interested: I put Lostpedia back up for deletion review. If you have good argumants, please post them over there. Just be aware of the wikipedia policies for 'accepting' websites: [1], [2] and [3]. --Peephole 17:06, 19 July 2006 (PDT)\
- i shall do my best, although i haven't edited a whole lot over there... --kaini. 21:23, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
No lost tonight?[]
According to ABC.com, there's no lost on tonight July 19. Instead they're airing something called "the one", and next week is slated for a double header of The Long Con, and One of Them. Could somebody change the front page to reflect this? It's a horrible tease! --Beardog4314 17:44, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
- If that is true then it's different than what they have in their press releases. It's possible they changed after the releases came out. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 21:25, 19 July 2006 (PDT)
- Can a sysop please fix that "this week on lost" section? The text is badly aligned. --Peephole 09:19, 25 July 2006 (PDT)
Looks like ABC is showing The One again this week (7/26), as well. Annoyingly, TV schedule websites such as tv.yahoo.com show the "old Wednesday schedule", which includes two episodes of Lost, up until Wednesday itself rolls around - at which point, the listing changes to something else (in this case, it's The One again). Sadly, the Lost schedule is ticking along, and episodes that are "missed" in this manner apparently aren't scheduled for rebroadcast, which kind of leaves an annoying "gap" in the story. (I haven't seen most of Season 2 yet, as I've been relying on the re-runs on ABC.) --Shodan1138 16:10, 26 July 2006 (PDT)
Article of the week[]
You have a warning to non USA viewers and say to be careful and yet you spoil something on the main page so how are you supposed to be careful? I should at least something UK viewers have seen or something from season 1. Any thoughts? - Dee4leeds 09:17 GMT
- I hope you realise that the Box article is complete parody. Lostpedia is based on US airdates. There is no feasible way to mark something as a UK-spoiler. I wouldn't go to a Doctor Who wiki and expect to see info about only the episodes that have aired on the US SciFi channel. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 08:00, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
- You've missed my point, the object its self should be non spoiler not the info like if the article was about Locke. The title and pictured show Locke but the text could spoil. Unlike the pearl which has now spoilt it for me. All I was trying to do was see the latest glyphs on the Lost expeience. Dee4leeds 17:50 GMT
- OK, you're starting to make sense. Either way though, the site and spoiler tags are based on US airings. Since the pearl was revealed in a season 2 episode it's not really a spoiler. I see your problem here and it's tough to keep current on the lost experience when the UK is not caught up to US airings. You might want to just bookmark the portal pages for the lost experience, or the nav template. Jabberwock talk contribs email - 10:19, 2 August 2006 (PDT)
- Thanks for the link I'll use that from now on or at least till season 2 ends. Dee4leeds 15:25 GMT
Chainki + Lost[]
I'm sorry if this is in the wrong place. I am the webmaster of the wiki http://chainki.org and would like if possible for you to add a link somewhere within LostPedia to the Lost pages on Chainki. If I could find a suitable place, I would add a link directly here myself, but it's better if one of you folk do it. And, since Chainki it is a wiki, to directly verify, update, change, add, reorganise and generally make this the best place for Lost links on the web - of course LostPedia will remain the best place for Lost encyclopedic content ;-). Hugh 07:15, 5 August 2006 (PDT)
- You're now on List of websites under the category "information." I would put you under Wiki but its not primarily a Lost wiki so I think info is the most appropriate --Nickb123 (Talk) 09:36, 5 August 2006 (PDT)
Thanks Nickb123! Hugh 11:36, 5 August 2006 (PDT)
bug[]
anywhere on this site the cat for oceanic flight 815 passenger , so this page is listened as a passenger ^^ Cool Man 0912 12:46, 9 December 2006 (PST)