ABC Fred Lab[]
Is anything known about abc fred lab?--Mc peko 23:45, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
Check its entry on the wiki: ABC Fred Labs. --FireSoul 23:59, 16 February 2009 (UTC)
You and I made that page! And it's stub. Seems it's lab not labs btw.--Mc peko 00:17, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Hey! I Helped! Permafry 42 00:22, 17 February 2009 (UTC)
Second paragraph[]
I think the second paragraph should be deleted from the text. That information is canon (it was mentioned in podcasts and in the ARG), and so far no other new information has been revealed on the show -- it's important to notice that the problems related to the spoiler leak in 5x04 happened due to miscommunication between ABC Fred Lab and the show's editing team. Also worth noting that I included a clarification of this under the 5x06 video. --FireSoul|talk|contributions 23:20, 22 February 2009 (UTC)
- You mentioned that the information was mentioned in an ARG. ARGs are not considered canon. That paragraph is not denying that the reference to John 3:16 is canon, but saying that it can not be assumed to be canon just because it was mentioned in the Lost Untangled video. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 00:45, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to mark the article disputed canon because, while they are very funny, they cannot be canon, else they are full of inconsistancies (e.g., Sayid on the plane not escorted by law enforcement and on the wrong side of the plane, Desmond and Jack being hit by pendulm, etc.). I love them, but they are not canon. ---- LOSTonthisdarnisland 04:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Exactly my point, thank you. I was looking for the appropriate banner but I couldn't locate it. Thank you for putting it on the article. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 04:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. But what was spoiled in the Little Prince untangled from This Place is Death? I must have missed that. ---- LOSTonthisdarnisland 04:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I didn't add that paragraph to the article so I'm not sure. Let me take a look over the video and see. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Alright I watched the video and compared it to the episode's page.... the only "spoiler" that I noticed from the Untangled video was Rousseau saying that it was 1988 which she didn't mention until the next episode, This Place is Death. However, that's not a major spoiler considering we could already assume the year based on previous knowledge. I will delete the paragraph unless notified of another spoiler. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! I thought I was going crazy because I just didn't catch a spoiler at all. ---- LOSTonthisdarnisland 00:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
- Alright I watched the video and compared it to the episode's page.... the only "spoiler" that I noticed from the Untangled video was Rousseau saying that it was 1988 which she didn't mention until the next episode, This Place is Death. However, that's not a major spoiler considering we could already assume the year based on previous knowledge. I will delete the paragraph unless notified of another spoiler. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:13, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Hmmm... I didn't add that paragraph to the article so I'm not sure. Let me take a look over the video and see. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:09, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- No worries. But what was spoiled in the Little Prince untangled from This Place is Death? I must have missed that. ---- LOSTonthisdarnisland 04:59, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- Exactly my point, thank you. I was looking for the appropriate banner but I couldn't locate it. Thank you for putting it on the article. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 04:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
- I'm going to mark the article disputed canon because, while they are very funny, they cannot be canon, else they are full of inconsistancies (e.g., Sayid on the plane not escorted by law enforcement and on the wrong side of the plane, Desmond and Jack being hit by pendulm, etc.). I love them, but they are not canon. ---- LOSTonthisdarnisland 04:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
Nuke the island???[]
In the most recent Lost Untangled, they said quote "plot to nuke the island" Are they serious??? Did they really plan to nuke the island??? Please tell me what you think (and discuss whether or not this is canon information.) Permafry 42 19:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes in fact they did in a sense. Remember that the freighter was filled with explosives? And how Ben said that everyone on the Island was going to die? This is technically canon information. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 15:20, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- That isn't nuking the island, just the people on it. It's like shooting the tires of a car. All you need to do is get replacement tires and the car works fine. In a sense, nuking the island would mean more along the lines of blowing up the car, (or setting it on fire).
Permafry 42 19:39, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Its all a question of semantics. I don't believe that the creators of the video intended for this to be confusing. It was just a funny way of them mentioning the plan to kill the people on the Island. It's just a term... nothing more. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- fair enough. but still... Permafry 42 23:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Its canon because it is referring to an actual part of the show, whether or not they had a poor choice of words. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Nuke doesn't necessarily mean an atomic bomb, but is also more losely used as a widely distributed destruction, which is valid with canon. Remember that Untangled are usually accurate, if slightly exaggerated, as with the way Desmond says "brutha" every fourth word or so, etc. So "nuke" in this case might be a bit exaggerated, but not inaccurate really. ---- LOSTonthisdarnisland 03:08, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Its canon because it is referring to an actual part of the show, whether or not they had a poor choice of words. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- fair enough. but still... Permafry 42 23:35, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Its all a question of semantics. I don't believe that the creators of the video intended for this to be confusing. It was just a funny way of them mentioning the plan to kill the people on the Island. It's just a term... nothing more. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:27, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- It did happen. -- Clayburn talk contributions email 09:03, April 14, 2010 (UTC)
Clips[]
There's no clips from the episodes, as far as I can see. This should be removed.--Mc peko 00:53, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
- Absolutely not, no offense. The offending clip is at 1:59 in the "He's Our You" video. It is a single image, featuring Ben. I can't say anymore. Going along with the transcript the image is shown during this dialogue...
| “ |
"Aw man! So Ilana isn't a buxom brunette looking for fun? *kicking noise heard* She's a bounty hunter, a sexy Boba Fettt, hired by one of the many folks Sayid murdered when he was working for the lying, scheming, conniving and above all - diabolical - Ben Linus." |
” |
- ...immediately as they say 'Ben Linus'. The image is there and it is a new, never before seen image that reveals a lot. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 21:43, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Sure we need the spoiler tag. That's not my point. I'm just saying that clips means video not photos. That's how I use the word anyways.--Mc peko 10:04, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry I was confused as to what you were talking about. You are referring to the intro paragraph on the page, yes? Where it says that clips from episodes are used in the videos? The video in question is the "Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham" one. When Locke is talking to Sayid, Kate, Walt, Jack, etc. begging them to return to the Island, the action figures are talking while clips from the episode (where he was actually talking to them) are rolling in the background. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 15:20, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
Interwiki[]
What does the recently added pl:Lost: Untangled mean?--Mc peko 05:53, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
That's the polish version. Permafry 42 12:37, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Really? Hmmm... It's not supposed to show up on the page?--Mc peko 12:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
Erm... spoiler?[]
So I was watching the latest video for Lost Untangled and I noticed that they included an image never used in an episode yet. And using my skills (not really that hard to tell) I determined that it is highly likely that this image is from an upcoming episode, possibly the next one. The image is at 1:59 if you care to look. So I was wondering... should the video be temporarily taken down? What do we do? ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 23:27, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
We have a spoiler-tag. That's good enough for me.--Mc peko 07:57, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I talked to CTS about the matter and they added the tag and warning. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 17:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, someone uploaded the image to the site last night and I happened to click it in Recent Changes before it was swiftly deleted. It's very spoilerish, and I don't know how ABC are letting these creep into their videos.--Baker1000 17:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Oh that stinks! I'm sorry. I suppose its like the enhanced episodes in which they don't really have time to monitor the content. And yes, it is a very spoilerish image. I suppose the creators of the vids sometimes forget what has aired and what hasn't, since they probably have access to all un-aired episodes.
- Yeah Baker, I saw that too. I can't believe they would put that in the video. -- CTS Talk Contribs 17:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- It was a really split second though. Like I had trouble pausing on it. But, it was in there nonetheless. I think it reveals a lot about the next episode and the plot. Just from one little picture. They should really be careful about that. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 17:51, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- As soon as I realised, I clicked back and you had already deleted it, CTS. So thanks for being so quick on that. :)--Baker1000 18:01, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, someone uploaded the image to the site last night and I happened to click it in Recent Changes before it was swiftly deleted. It's very spoilerish, and I don't know how ABC are letting these creep into their videos.--Baker1000 17:40, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah I talked to CTS about the matter and they added the tag and warning. ♥meggie ~ Talk & contribs 17:11, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
Sort of similar, if you go to the "Dr. Linus" video, in the flashes, you can see 1:54-1:56, the Chang puppet is dressed up like a pirate, which alludes to an episode two eps down the line ("Ab Aeterno"). --Sauronsmatrix 07:22, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
They fucked it[]
Season five's untangleds were great, and I couldn't stop laughting every time I saw one. In season 6, not only they are far shorter, now they focus more on puppet Pierre Chang than on the rest of the episode. God, these new ones are awful. --Fixman 01:17, March 5, 2010 (UTC) Agreed... it sucks now. The original format was so much funnier. --Sauronsmatrix 07:19, March 31, 2010 (UTC)
The videos are good (3 stars each), but not as good as season 5 (who are each episode 5 stars worth) is my meaning.--Station7 21:16, April 1, 2010 (UTC)
Locked and Loaded[]
It is a goofy song about Locke User:Phryrosebdeco23|Phryrosebdeco23]] 08:49, April 29, 2010 (UTC)
Pilot[]
Why was the pilot removed?--Mc peko 14:47, June 6, 2010 (UTC)
Release dates[]
Ok so I have a question. Only first a few episodes of this aired on TV during Life on Mars, right? Rest are published online next day after the episodes? Is that correct? Do we know exactly which episodes were aired on TV during Life on Mars? Basically I'm trying to gather accurate release dates for each episodes.