Talk:Hanso correspondence

intro sentence needed

This article needs a short introductory sentence describing what this article is about, e.g., Hanso Correspondence is blah blah blah from The Lost Experience. Also, is this a proper noun, or should capitalization be adjusted? -- ^Contrib¯ _Santa_ ¯  ^Talk 18:27, 13 December 2006 (PST)

I am pretty sure that it isn't a proper noun, as it is just the Hanso Foundation corresponding with others, so spelling should be adjusted. --Marik7772003 19:22, 13 December 2006 (PST)

Deletion

Delete: Simply lists letters with no analysis. Also lacks a considerable number of letters, and of course neglects ones mentioning Hanso briefly in them (such as one to Mittelwerk from Choi). I think it'd be best just to have the letters in their respective articles, i.e. under the titles of TLE characters / main article features --Nickb123 (Talk) 08:26, 12 March 2007 (PDT)

• Keep but Expand - it's a good idea to organize all the letters in one place or easy viewing. We should review this and cleanup/add explanations/add missing documents in. --Gateboy42 13:20, 16 March 2007 (PDT)

• Keep - A cleanup is more appropriate. --|MMORTAL /\LIEN 20:15, 18 March 2007 (PDT)

• Keep - Keep under the condition of putting up for cleanup/rewrite.   Hooper   talk    contribs    email   22:41, 20 March 2007 (PDT)

• Keep - These letters are interesting and details within them may become more pertinent as the show progresses. I support cleanup suggestions. --TechNic 17:42, 23 March 2007 (PDT)

• Keep - Clean up. If you think there is analysis or material missing, then add it! --Jackdavinci 19:07, 29 April 2007 (PDT)

• Keep - This is a handy page, why delete it ? TiZon 11:02, 11 May 2007 (PDT)

• Keep - A page can exist without there being an analysis...your reasons for deletion are ridiculous. If there are letters missing, add them. --Amberjet11 11:04, 11 May 2007 (PDT)

New Deletion round

After working on new articles with more analysis, I think we should do a new round for this deletion discussion. Note that all the sources have been successfully integrated into the GWC, DaimlerChrysler and Project Sumo articles amongst others (I've also added the sources to specific character pages that were short). As on these pages, the sources have been analyzed and cross-referenced, so I now think there is no argument left for keeping this page when the sources are in their necessary articles and are explained properly in relation to the story. --Nickb123 (Talk) 09:00, 14 April 2007 (PDT)

• Delete: per Nicks reasons. --   Dee4leeds  talk  contribs  all  03:11, 5 May 2007 (PDT)
• Delete per Nick --Mr. Crabby (Talk) 13:42, 7 May 2007 (PDT)
• Delete: as above. Good job :) --Gateboy42 12:20, 8 May 2007 (PDT)