Merging[]
- I think it's a good idea to merge a lot of this, but don't the Tail section and Middle section still deserve their own passages (as "Main Article")? Looks like middle section is still independent, but I thought we need a page listing members of the tail section. --PandoraX 11:32, 30 October 2006 (PST)
- The previous tail section article was pretty sparse, so I just merged it in. The list of tail section members is on Tailies -- Paladine<c.t> 11:40, 30 October 2006 (PST)
Bernard[]
I think that Bernard did something like Charlie, that run away from the lavatory when the plane started the emergency protocol. And that's the reason why he was on that sit. --andreapasotti
I agree that it's kind of stupid to put a line about it being unclear about Bernard's seat. If a plane is going down, you better believe that I'd run out of the bathroom, find the nearest seat and strap myself in. --aericina 11:49, 27 April 2007 (EDT)
Dead people from middle section (was: Added sections)[]
1. How do we know 20 people died in the middle section? 2. And shouldnt the bit about seats empty in the front section be put under theories?--lewisg 07:17, 15 December 2006 (PST)
- According to Mikhail, there were 324 people on board, so how come there were only 69 total in the middle section? If nobody objects, I'd suggest removing the "20 people died" bit, unless someone can finde a source for that. Sure this figure isn't simply based on the number of dead bodies that could actually be SEEN in the Pilot?--Nevermore 10:55, 1 February 2008 (PST)
Is there any reason for keeping this article separate from the Oceanic Flight 815 article?[]
It seems like there's a lot of overlap, and the "Mystery of the submerged wreckage" seems to be a complete duplicate of the similar section on the other article. Is a merge in order? Robert K S (talk) 22:00, 29 March 2008 (PDT)
- I think the "mystery of the submerged wreckage" part could be trimmed once we find out more about the true story (i.e. if we know it's fake, it could be trimmed to "Fake wreckage" stating that another wreckage was found, but was staged). But that will have to wait until more details become known.--Nevermore 16:34, 22 May 2008 (PDT)
Tail section on "western side"?[]
Lately I've been seeing quite a few claims about Island geography as canon, despite lack of or conflicting evidence. One of them is under the Tail Section section of this article that states that their camp was on the western side of the island. What is the evidence for this? As I recall, the Tailies travelled from the eastern side to get to the main section beach camp. When Locke asked Sawyer which side the ocean was on, and he pointed left, and Locke said their group came from the east. --Celebok 03:39, September 11, 2010 (UTC)
- Since nobody responded, I've removed "western" from the article. --Celebok 16:12, November 23, 2010 (UTC)