In show parodies

Kiwi, thank you for this addition. I think it's a great idea, and funny to watch. I'm going to add this for time travel and dinosaurs as well. --PandoraX 08:09, 11 February 2007 (PST)


Can I add the one where they're all on the back of a giant turtle? Funny. --Princess Dharma (banned) 03:29, 18 February 2007 (PST)


Let me tell you that Lost fans never cease to amaze me with their persistence in trying to defend that retarded theory even now that Bernard's name has been clearly mentioned on the show. No matter how much evidence we get for Rose and Bernard still existing in the show's universe, some fans keep coming up with bizarrely convoluted time-travel theories just in order to defend a theory that has never had any fundamental basis on the show other than "it COULD be..."--Nevermore 14:36, 20 April 2007 (PDT)

"Friend of" (time travel)

As said in the article, there's no way to prove this and there's no source listed or anything. Anyone who doesn't agree with me that this has no place on Lostpedia?--Nevermore 09:25, 6 October 2007 (PDT)


I don't think we should debunk a theory listening to what Damon and Carlton say. In one of the recent podcast (I'm really sorry, but I can't remember which one) they say that they can't tell everyone if a theory is right or wrong. It was something like "We are answering a milion of questions, and sometimes we can't simple say: 'Yeah, that's right', spoiling this thing to everybody". Anyway, there are already some "How to producers contradicted themselves" explaining this. So: why this page still exists? Andreapasotti 03:54, 5 June 2008 (PDT)

Time Travel

Following "The Economist", "The Constant" and "There's No Place Like Home, Part 2"/"The Shape of Things to Come", wouldn't the "time-travel" section require some major rewriting?--Nevermore 15:04, 13 September 2008 (PDT)

I say following season 5 the whole section should be removed. --Blueeagleislander 23:43, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
Agree. Drop the entire section.--Jim in Georgia Contribs Talk 00:07, October 29, 2009 (UTC)


I followed the link at the end of the "Aliens" section to ABC News. Alongside the article on ABC's page is a list of their current "Top Stories", and one of today's headlines: "Aussie Fire Toll Reaches 108" Jack Hare 21:10, 8 February 2009 (UTC)


There's nothing in the show that explicitly shows the island isn't a space ship (or sitting on top of a space ship). The source of the Source is never revealed - there could be anything down there, from the mind of God to a crashed timeship with a malfunctioning hyperdrive. All we know is it's a magic light hole. Given that the main debunking statement ("There are no spaceships. There isn't any time travel") is suspect in light of all the time travel in Season 5, I think the "Aliens" segment should be shunted back to the main Theories area. Well, not the part about the Others, just the Island. - KingAndy 14:47, November 2, 2010 (UTC)


The standard for getting on this article isn't that the show debunked the theory. The show debunked thousands of theories. Instead, this article covers theories that the show acknowledged. We should name it accordingly. --- Balk Of Fametalk 17:03, July 8, 2011 (UTC)

I agree the name should be change to something more fitting such as Exposed Theories not sure if that is any better but its my 2 cents

--Mtmartin3 (talk) 15:15, March 28, 2013 (UTC)

Community content is available under CC BY-NC-ND unless otherwise noted.