Delete[]
- We already have the Timeline articles --Mr. Crabby (Talk) 12:53, 27 February 2007 (PST)
- Agreed, unless some makes an analysis that provides more insight. --Hunter61 05:32, 1 March 2008 (PST)
- NO! The camera focused on the calendar, it might be an important clue. I improved the layout of the calendar, looks better now. Would also recommend to add it to {{Nav-Freighter}} --Effgeh 08:57, 1 March 2008 (PST)
- No! Its much improved, and the Xs may become relevant.--Kivipat
- No! First of all, because of the work the calendar was. And second of all, imho there's something with this calendar (maybe an easter egg or something like that...) >: LOSTgeek
- Abstain: I think it could stay as an item category page. Maybe its apparent notoriety as a possible clue is enough justification for it to stay? --Nickb123 (Talk) 11:27, 1 March 2008 (PST)
- No: Improved and possible significance in the future. --NSHS07 (talk) 10:00, 2 March 2008 (PST)
- No: This calender is an obvious clue. -- Nusentinsaino talk contribs email 10:01, 2 March 2008 (PST)
- NO: They didn't put a calendar with different colors in the episode for no reason. --CTS 19:22, 2 March 2008 (PST)
- No: It confirms the off-island date. It can also be an interesting clue (if the colors mean anything - who was responsible for some activity on a specific day; who was present during some time and why...) -- Steff talk contribs email 07:34, 3 March 2008 (PST)
- Removed deletion flag! I hope that's okay. 7.5 times "No" should justify it. -- • Effgeh • • talk • • contributions • 09:43, 3 March 2008 (PST)
Remove details[]
I realize that past editors put a lot of trouble into transcribing the dates and colors, but seeing that those colors did not turn out to mean anything, isn't this article kind of overkill? Can't we just show the picture of the calendar and be done with it? --- Balk Of Fame ♪ talk 17:51, June 24, 2011 (UTC)