Just be sure about it when you request this, it might be a while when you can edit the page again.

Track which pages are protected

Can we consider adding a table somewhere that tracks which pages are protected, and why they were protected? I get the impression that sysops are afraid to unprotect a page, because they don't know why a page was protected in the first place. Tracking this information in a central location might help.--Dagg 20:43, 15 January 2007 (PST)

Delete this page?

As far as I can tell, this page is not actually used anymore. Maybe it should be deleted? I've been told in the past to message the sysops directly rather than use this page.-- Dagg talk contribs4 8 08:09, 10 February 2007 (PST)

I've been thinking about this. How about a new category called "Request for Change" which covers the basic rules of asking a sysop, and links to the sysop page, so they can send you a request. -- Plkrtn  talk  contribs  email  17:53, 12 February 2007 (PST)
The problem with having a category for this is that a protected page can't be edited by regular users.    Jabberwock    talk    contribs    email   - 10:51, 23 February 2007 (PST)

Unlock, and do not delete Scientology Theory

I am opening my view to be hear on this pressing issue. The theory page for Scientology should be unlocked, and not up for deletion. To delete this page would be horrible usage of censorship and against TOS. This is statement and comment is completely based on my opinion. Since I am new to this wiki, I do not know of other users that would agree. However, the sole POV of Scientology Theory is exploration of connections to LOST (That's it; Nothing more, nothing less). Please realize that LOSTpedia is not here to slam Scientology or other users. From my understanding LOSTpedia is here to wikify LOST. In conclusion, I highly doubt "real" Scientologists are using LOSTpedia or make edits to this page. Due to the software 99.9% of scientologists upload (upon joinging the organziation, rather than just studing it) to their comupters that prevent them from using wiki sites such as this one. If you are reading this comment and are indeed a realScientologist, I would be extremely interested in hearing your opinion about this pressing subject of LOST and its critique of SoC. Thank you again. I hope everyone enjoys tonights ep. Enturbulate

Definition pages

I've just reorganized the "Background cast" and the "Redshirt" pages for clarification and all, and I believe they still need some work done. It was done after the concepts became pretty messed up by partial POVs.

Nevertheless, just now it came to mind that maybe clear definition pages, ones that are unlikely to undesirable change (like those two), could make good use of a permanent blocking policy. This is just a question, not a request: What would be Lostpedia's stance on this? -- -. Grillage .- 00:56, 22 May 2007 (PDT)

Spring clean?

Anyone with the powers care to give the page a bit of a tidy up? Many of the requests have been actioned and need to be removed or moved to the appropriate section.--TechNic|talk|conts 10:56, 13 April 2008 (PDT)

I did this, I figure yes we should keep discussion on granted/denied requests for stuff, but this is just a simple "I want to edit it, can I" page - its no big to archive it all.--Nickb123 (Talk) 07:26, 12 July 2008 (PDT)
Community content is available under CC BY-NC-ND unless otherwise noted.