FANDOM


(Nominations)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
**'''No:''' This article needs some work before it can be seriously considered. --[[User:Jabrwocky7|Jabrwocky7]] 12:42, 11 July 2006 (PDT)
 
**'''No:''' This article needs some work before it can be seriously considered. --[[User:Jabrwocky7|Jabrwocky7]] 12:42, 11 July 2006 (PDT)
   
===Portal:[[Filming locations]]===
+
'''PLEASE VOTE FOR WEEK 39 BELOW'''
* Nominated by: {{User:PandoraX/sig}}
 
* Think it's an interesting page to look at with a new perspective on Lost production, and shows good research. --{{User:PandoraX/sig}} 11:52, 1 September 2006 (PDT)
 
 
===[[Sri Lanka Video]]===
 
* Nominated by {{user:Kaini/sig}}
 
* i think that the [[sri lanka video]] now has enough information to merit an AotW nomination. although i'm not a participant in the lost experience, the fact that we now know with a degree of certainty that beardy is hanso is an important revelation for everybody. as well as that, the use of templates and the layout of the article is really good.
 
** '''sample text''': The [[Sri Lanka Video]] is perhaps the [[Lost Experience]] clue that has the most impact on the plot of the television show so far. It features what seem to be new images of the elusive [[Alvar Hanso]], as well as spelling out what the acronym DHARMA stands for, and allusions to [[the island]].
 
**'''Not Yet''' In a couple of weeks, definitely. But it's still evolving so much day by day that it shouldn't be featured until it's complete. --[[User:Jajasoon|Jajasoon]] 09:15, 14 August 2006 (PDT)
 
**''Yes'' - I don't mind a 'current event' being featured. It's appropriate as we wait for S3 to begin broadcasting. --{{User:Santa/sig}}17:33, 14 August 2006 (PDT)
 
***'''No''' - I change my vote to a no, based on arguments of other voters in this thread--{{User:Santa/sig}}06:09, 26 August 2006 (PDT)
 
**'''No:''' To anyone new to Lost or the Lost Experience, I think this page would be too confusing. --{{User:Phmall/sig}} 14:54, 17 August 2006 (PDT)
 
**'''Not Yet''', wait until it's finished and sorted correctly.
 
:--[[User:Dt7|Chris]] 13:31, 23 August 2006 (PDT)
 
:'''Not yet as well''': Wait to last segment comes in. When completed this is probably the only TLE article I would agree with being the featured article.--{{User:Captain Insano/sig}} 13:28, 24 August 2006 (PDT)
 
:'''Not yet''' from me too. I would love to renominate it in 2 weeks or so when the video is done. --{{User:PandoraX/sig}} 16:30, 26 August 2006 (PDT)
 
*'''No''' --'''<font face="Comic Sans MS"> [[User:SilvaStorm|<span style="color:#808080;font-size:120%">Silva</span>]][[User_talk:SilvaStorm|<span style="color:Blue;font-size:120%">Storm</span>]]</font>''' 01:20, 29 August 2006 (PDT)
 
*'''Still Not Yet''' Give it a few weeks and it definitely will be AoTW.--<font face="Courier">[[User:marik7772003|<span style="color:#FF8C00">marik</span>]][[User talk:marik7772003|<span style="color:#00F5FF">777</span>]][[Special:Contributions/marik7772003|<span style="color:#FF0000">2003</span>]]</font> 13:00, 31 August 2006 (PDT)
 
**What is up with Marik's sig code? Really messy here in edit. --{{User:Santa/sig}}15:29, 9 September 2006 (PDT)
 
*'''UPDATE''': Now that the video is complete, we need to rewrite the article, and clean it up to be a model article for AOTW. Let's put it up for another vote when this is complete, ideally before S3 begins.--{{User:Santa/sig}}
 
 
===[[Sri Lanka Video]] (renomination)===
 
* Nominated by {{User:Santa/sig}}02:40, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
 
* As per discussion in original August 12 (04:28) nomination by {{User:Kaini/sig}}, we have waited until the video has been completed. The article has now been extensively rewritten and reorganized to reflect the goal of describing a completed video rather than documenting a game-in-progress. However the record of how the game proceeded is notable and important and has been retained in the article for historical interest, in the form of the video and transcript listed by segment; this information is now appended at the end of the article. Theory bullet lists have been rewritten as prose. All in all, it's a [[Sri Lanka Video|''completely overhauled article'']] compared to [http://www.lostpedia.com/index.php?title=Sri_Lanka_Video&oldid=77899 the original version] at the time of the last nomination. Now that the video is complete, TLE is drawing to a close, and S3 is about to begin in a few weeks, this article is keenly appropriate as a summary of this summer break.
 
* '''Yes''' It definitely deserves AOTW now. Great example of Lostpedia teamwork to get to something that no other site has really achieved. I think Henry Gale's article could be nominated anytime after this, but this is a unique time to showcase the Sri Lanka video (before S3).--{{User:PandoraX/sig}} 20:10, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
 
 
===[[Henry Gale]]===
 
*Nominated by --{{User:Marik7772003/sig}} 05:52, 15 September 2006 (PDT)
 
*Reasons: I know that we've already had Mr. Friendly as AOTW, but this is a very good article. It explains a lot about one of the most mysterious people on the island. It is a well-written article with neatly organized information and theories. It is a model article.
 
*'''Yes:''' This is a good article. --{{User:Jabberwock/sig}} - 18:52, 16 September 2006 (PDT)
 
*'''Yes:''' for the same reason above{{User:John Locke biggest fan/sig}}
 
*'''Yes:''' Awesome article, reads like an encyclopedia, perfect example of what we have to show here. --{{User:Aero Zeppelin/sig}} 19:20, 16 September 2006 (PDT)
 
*'''No''' - Too many sections dominated by bullets. It just scrolls and scrolls-- despite the quality of the other secitons, these bulleted sections simply do not lend themselves to reading. --{{User:Santa/sig}}23:28, 16 September 2006 (PDT)
 
*'''Not Yet''' Good article, but I think it could use a little work, I'd like to renominate it later. --{{User:PandoraX/sig}} 20:12, 17 September 2006 (PDT)
 
*'''Yes''' Worth an Featured Article status [[User:Blue eagle islander|Blue eagle islander]] 02:07, 18 September 2006 (PDT)
 
   
 
==Weeklies==
 
==Weeklies==

Revision as of 10:02, September 18, 2006


See Also: Article of the Week Archive
See Also: Article of the Week Nominations Archive
See Also: Article of the Week Nominations Archive (old format)

Nominations

Please use the following format for nominations and votes. Be sure to sign all nominations and votes using the signature button. If you previously nominated an article using the old format, please resubmit below.

Article Name (linked format)

  • Nominated by: Jabrwocky7
  • Initial comments regarding the nomination go here. This is where you should make your case regarding the nomination.
    • Yes: I think this is a worthy article for the article of the week. --Jabrwocky7 12:42, 11 July 2006 (PDT)
    • No: This article needs some work before it can be seriously considered. --Jabrwocky7 12:42, 11 July 2006 (PDT)

PLEASE VOTE FOR WEEK 39 BELOW

Weeklies

Current Week: 15 (Today is Thursday April 9, 2020)


LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 39 (Sep 24-Sep 30)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 38 (Sep 18-Sep 23)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 37 (Sep 11-Sep 17)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 36 (Sep 4-Sep 10)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 35 (Aug 28-Sep 3)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 34 (Aug 21-27)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 33 (Aug 14-20)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 32 (Aug 7-13)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 31 (Jul 31-Aug 6)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 30 (Jul 24-30)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 29 (Jul 17-23)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 28 (Jul 10-16)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 27 (Jul 3-9)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 26 (Jun 29-Jul 2)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 25 (Jun 26-28)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 24 (Jun 19-25)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 23 (Jun 12-18)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 22 (Jun 5-11)

LostPedia:Featured article for 2006, week 21 (May 29-Jun 4)

Community content is available under CC BY-NC-ND unless otherwise noted.